ECHOGENIC (HYPERECHOGENIC) BOWEL |
GRADING SYSTEM FOR ECHOGENIC BOWEL |
Link
to Grading System for Echogenic Bowel
CAUSES OF ECHOGENIC BOWEL |
CMV infection |
|
|
|
|
|
Trisomy 21 |
|
|
Table of Echogenic Bowel and Pregnancy Outcome |
|||||||
Ref |
GA (wks) |
Poor perinatal outcome (%) |
Chromosomal defects (%) |
Cystic fibrosis(%) |
Infection(%) |
IUGR (%)* |
Perinatal death(%)** |
1 |
15-34 |
40 |
3 |
13 |
0 |
21 |
14 |
2 |
15-24 |
47 |
25 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
8 |
3 |
14-24 |
42 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
12 |
4 |
15-21 |
34 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
17 |
5 |
14-34 |
39 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
13 |
6 |
16-20 |
14 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
14-23 |
46 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
16-22 |
28 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
11 |
11 |
9 |
15-23 |
29 |
11 |
0 |
10 |
7 |
8 |
* Excluding chromosomally abnormal fetuses. ** Excluding chromosomally abnormal fetuses and terminations. |
It is still controversial whether
isolated echogenic bowel justifies invasive testing irrespective of whether
associated findings are present. Strocher and co-workers (9) found the
prevalence of chromosome defects is at least five-fold higher than that
expected on the basis of maternal age. They suggest that even for a 20-year old
with a background prevalence of 1:1295 for trisomy 21, the adjusted risk is
1:260.
REFERENCES |