AMNIOTIC BAND SYNDROME (ABS)

 

The amniotic band syndrome is a group of sporadic congenital anomalies characterized by amputations, constriction bands, pseudosyndactylism and multiple craniofacial, visceral and body wall defects. It occurs in 1 in 1200 to 1 in 15 000 live births (1). Although the exact cause of the syndrome is not known, early rupture of the amniotic membrane resulting in bands that insert on the body of the fetus is the most accepted view (1).

 

Sonographic appearance of membrane

Relationship to Fetus

* Thin aberrant bands of tissue attached to the fetus.

* Fetal deformities.
* Restriction of fetal movement secondary to entrapment by bands.
* Bands may be very difficult to visualize

   but characteristic fetal deformities in a

    non-embryonic distribution is highly suggestive.

 

 

* Commonly associated with fetal deformities.
* Limb defects.
  - Lymphedema (due to constriction ring
  - Amputation (asymmetric).
  - Distal syndactyly (differentiates ABS from genetic or teratogenic causes).
  - Clubbed feet.
* Craniofacial defects.
  - Lateral meningocele & Encephalocele
  - Asymmetric micropthalmia
  - Anencephaly / Facial Clefting.
* Visceral defects.
  - Gastroschisis
± liver exteriorization
  - Omphalocele.
  - Ectopia cordis.
  - Limb-body wall complex.

Relationship to Placenta

Timing

Pathology/Etiology

* Usually none.
* Occasionally may constrict the base of the cord at the placental attachment (lethal).

* Early amnion rupture is thought to result in ABS due to the adhesive nature of the external amnion and chorion.

* Entrapment of fetal parts is the result of rupture of the amnion and development of fibrous mesodermal bands on the chorionic side of the amnion.
* Recurrence risk is negligible(sporadic)

 

 

 

 

 

Central nervous system – large encephalocele

Central nervous system – lateral meningocele

Central nervous system and face – enecephalocele, large orbit, abnormal mouth and nose due to slash defects.

Abdomen – Omphalocele (long arrow delineated the omphalocele; short arrow represents the covering membrane). the fetus also had anencephaly.

Limbs – band attached to the hand. No defect seen

Limbs – constriction defect involving the thigh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video of Amniotic Band Syndrome

 

 

 

 

 

 

The most accepted theory to explain the pathogenesis of the amniotic band syndrome was presented by Torpin (1). According to his theory, the primary event is a rupture of the amniotic membrane and its detachment from the chorion with amniotic fluid leaking through the tear. As a result, the fetus can move digits or limbs through this tear and exit the amniotic cavity (partially or completely). The outer surface of the amnion, and to a lesser degree the naked chorion, produce mesodermic fibrous strings which may entangle and entrap different fetal organs, leading to constriction and amputation anomalies. These deductions agree with the increased frequency of constriction bands located more distally on the digits, hands and feet, as well as with the varying severity of constrictions, ranging from slight grooves in the skin to actual amputation of the digit or limb (2). However, this theory does not explain the association of amniotic bands with damage to internal organs and other severe anomalies. Bronshtein and Zimmer (3) challenged the concept that amniotic bands amputate fetal organs. Over the period of a decade, they observed many cases of finger and limb amputations without ever visualizing attachment of amnion at the exact site of amputation. They also wondered why amputations always seem to occur transversely and discussed the possibility of a primary teratogenic insult.

 

REFERENCES

1.      Torpin R. Amniochorionic mesoblastic fibrous strings and amniotic bands: associated constricting fetal malformations or fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 91: 65–75

2.      Browne D. The pathology of congenital ring constrictions. Arch Dis Child 1957; 32: 517–9.

3.      Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ. Do amniotic bands amputate fetal organs? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 309–11